top of page

RESEARCH

Area of Specialization

Ancient Greek Philosophy (especially Plato, Aristotle, and pre-Socratic poetry)

Areas of Competency

History of Philosophy, Philosophy of Art and Literature, Feminist Philosophies

PUBLICATIONS

prometheus-fire.jpg

"Aporia in Action: Human Nature in Protagoras' Great Myth"

2024, Ancient Philosophy

This paper argues that Protagoras’ great myth depicts human nature as both Promethean and Epimethean: human foresight depends on the condition of oversight. If Protagoras’ praise of foresight betrays his desire to overcome this condition, Socrates embraces it. While Protagoras repeats Epimetheus’ mistake of forgetting his own nature by aiming to overcome the risks of oversight, Socrates’ foresight recognizes that oversight and perplexity are intrinsic to human nature.

Pitagora_da_Reggio_-_Louvre_-_Statua_di_un_suonatore_di_lira2.jpg

"Finding the Means: Socrates in Dialogue with Simonides"

Winner of the 2023 Review of Metaphysics Dissertation Essay Contest

2024, Review of Metaphysics

This article explores Socrates' long analysis of Simonides' "Ode to Scopas," found near the end of Plato's Protagoras. Socrates misinterprets the poem to suggest that virtue is akin to technical knowledge, whereas the poem suggests instead that a wholly virtuous life is impossible, and that the good life is divine, achievable only by the gods. The author argues that Socrates' exegesis dialectically opposes the idea that virtue is knowledge, along with his suggestion that the good life can be secured through a hedonistic calculus, with the poem's emphasis on the insurmountable limitations to human flourishing. Socrates' misreading highlights the provisional and aporetic nature of philosophical accounts of virtue, suggesting that continuous inquiry in the face of misfortune is constitutive of human goodness. The article concludes by proposing that philosophical speech must be self-disclosive and poetic, indicating its own limitations, while engaging in a dialogical pursuit of truth.

Screen Shot 2022-02-10 at 8.25.22 PM.png

"THE COMMON ORIGINS OF PHILOSOPHICAL AND POLITICAL POWER IN PLATO'S GORGIAS"

2021, Plato Journal

Plato’s Gorgias concerns the tension between political and philosophical power. In it, Socrates and Gorgias discuss rhetoric’s power, which Gorgias claims is universal, containing all powers, enabling the rhetorician to rule over others politically. Polus and Callicles develop Gorgias’s understanding of rhetoric’s universal power. Scholars addressing power’s central focus rightly distinguish Socrates’ notion of philosophical power from Gorgias’s. However, these authors make this distinction too severe, overlooking the kinship between philosophy and politics. This paper argues that Socrates’ notion of power has its origins in Gorgias’s, but instead of seeking to persuade others, philosophy primarily concerns self-persuasion.

bottom of page